Voting Out Stephenie: Does it makes sense?

Posted by survivormuch
Feb 24 2010

Survivor:Heroes vs Villains’ second episode was really a shocker. In my own opinion Stephenie was a great player. She was able to survive Survivor Palau despite the losing streak of her tribe. She could’ve been a big help for the Heroes tribe BUT, looks like majority of the tribe didn’t take this thought as a consideration before voting out Stephenie. Now, what awaits the Heroes tribe after voting out one of their strongest players?

Oh well, the heroes are really using their hearts in deciding. Yes, Stephenie may be wrong for talking a bit too much during the immunity challenge but come on James took over the talking the whole night blaming Stephenie for the lost. So macho of him to do all the whining and nagging, for crying out loud plus the attitude he showed at the tribal council was really unbearable.

Now, I am wondering, when will the Heroes finally get the groove to play the game? Most specially now that one strong player was out and James is showing his douche side. Will this be the start of the end of the Heroes tribe? For me, they are more like of villains too, looking the way they act, may be worst than villains.

Stephenie LaGrossa was one of the great players Survivor ever had, it’s just that she was caught in a bad situation that her tribe mates specifically James and also Rupert (who obviously wanted to get rid of Stephenie earlier this episode) took advantage of which surprisingly blinded the six members of the tribe.

Now, does it makes sense to oust Stephenie on the second episode? We will see the outcome next Thursday.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Share/Bookmark

No related posts.

2 Responses

  1. emily emilyNo Gravatar says:

    no sense at all. James is a real douche bag… he deserves to be voted off not Stephenie

CommentLuv Enabled

Trackback URL for this entry

survivormuch is using WP-Gravatar